Banks v. Comm'r of Corr.
This text of 197 A.3d 391 (Banks v. Comm'r of Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The respondent's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court,
"1. When a habeas petitioner claims that the criminal trial court erred by, omitting jury instructions on the intent element of kidnapping pursuant to State v. Salamon,
"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the absence of a Salamon instruction at the petitioner's criminal trial was not harmless error?"
McDONALD and MULLINS, Js., would deny the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 A.3d 391, 330 Conn. 950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-commr-of-corr-conn-2018.