Banks v. Comm'r of Corr.

197 A.3d 391, 330 Conn. 950
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 28, 2018
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 197 A.3d 391 (Banks v. Comm'r of Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Banks v. Comm'r of Corr., 197 A.3d 391, 330 Conn. 950 (Colo. 2018).

Opinion

The respondent's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 184 Conn.App. 101, 194 A.3d 780 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. When a habeas petitioner claims that the criminal trial court erred by, omitting jury instructions on the intent element of kidnapping pursuant to State v. Salamon, 287 Conn. 509, 949 A.2d 1092 (2008), is harm measured in accordance with Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 113 S.Ct. 1710, 123 L.Ed. 2d 353 (1993), or Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 119 S.Ct. 1827, 144 L.Ed. 2d 35 (1999)?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the absence of a Salamon instruction at the petitioner's criminal trial was not harmless error?"

McDONALD and MULLINS, Js., would deny the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coltherst v. Commissioner of Correction
208 Conn. App. 470 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2021)
Banks v. Commissioner of Correction
339 Conn. 1 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 A.3d 391, 330 Conn. 950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-commr-of-corr-conn-2018.