Banks v. Circuit Court of Alexandria
This text of 682 F. App'x 209 (Banks v. Circuit Court of Alexandria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
In these consolidated appeals, Dr. Simon Banks appeals the district court’s orders denying his emergency motion for a writ of mandamus, his motion for reconsideration, and his motions for injunctive and declaratory relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Banks v. Circuit Court of Alexandria, No. 1:16-cv-01309-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Oct. 17, 2016; Oct. 24, 2016; filed Dec. 20, 2016, entered December 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materiáls before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
682 F. App'x 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-circuit-court-of-alexandria-ca4-2017.