Banks v. Banks
119 S.E. 519, 156 Ga. 682, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 306
Opinion
The motion for new trial in this case contained the usual general grounds, and there were no exceptions to any rulings of the court pending the trial. There was evidence sufficient to support the verdict; and it having been approved by the trial judge, this court will not disturb that judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Banks v. Banks, 119 S.E. 519, 156 Ga. 682, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 306 (Ga. 1923).
119 S.E. 519 (Banks v. Banks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.