Banks Law Pub. Co. v. Lawyers' Co-operative Pub. Co.

169 F. 386, 94 C.C.A. 642, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4588
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 16, 1909
DocketNo. 183
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 169 F. 386 (Banks Law Pub. Co. v. Lawyers' Co-operative Pub. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Banks Law Pub. Co. v. Lawyers' Co-operative Pub. Co., 169 F. 386, 94 C.C.A. 642, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4588 (2d Cir. 1909).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is not necessary to discuss so much of the opinion below as deals with the questions of assignment and of the right of the official reporter to secure copyrights. We concur with Judge Hazel in his reasoning and conclusion that the arrangement of reported cases in sequence, their paging and distribution into volumes, are not features of such importance as to entitle the reporter to copyright protection of such details.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

West Publishing Company v. Mead Data Central, Inc.
799 F.2d 1219 (Eighth Circuit, 1986)
West Publishing Co. v. Mead Data Central, Inc.
616 F. Supp. 1571 (D. Minnesota, 1985)
Fred Fisher, Inc. v. Dillingham
298 F. 145 (S.D. New York, 1924)
Eggers v. Sun Sales Corp.
263 F. 373 (Second Circuit, 1920)
Park & Pollard Co. v. Kellerstrass
181 F. 431 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 F. 386, 94 C.C.A. 642, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-law-pub-co-v-lawyers-co-operative-pub-co-ca2-1909.