Bankruptcy Estate of Diego M. Galietti v. Western Progressive-Nevada, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided June 3, 2022·No. 2:21-cv-02034·Unknown

Opinion

RANDAL R. LEONARD, ESQ. 1 Nevada Bar No. 6716 2901 El Camino Avenue, #200 2 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 3 (702) 598-3667/ office (702) 598-3926/ facsimile 4 Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 DIEGO M. GALIETTI, an individual, 7 Plaintiff, 8 vs. Case No.: 2:21-cv-2034-APG BNW

9 WESTERN PROGRESSIVE-NEVADA, INC.; 10 CITIBANK, N.A., as Trustee of the American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2004-3, 11 Mortgage Backed Notes, Series 2004-3; and DOES I THROUGH X inclusive; and ROE 12 CORPORATION XX through XXX, inclusive, Defendants. 13

14 MOTION TO EXTEND TIME

15 (First Request)

16 On May 24, 2022 and May 25, 2022, this Court granted two stipulations in docket nos. 43 17 and 45 to extend time. In both stipulations, Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP and Ramir M. 18 Hernandez, Esq. made general appearances on behalf of defendant CITIBANK, N.A., as Trustee 19 of the American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2004-3, Mortgage Backed Notes, Series 20 21 2004-3. Plaintiff believes this constitutes a waiver of service of process as the Amended 22 Complaint and Summons were duly sent via the Court’s electronic mailing system when they 23 were filed and were sent via a separate electronic mailing to attorney Ramir M. Hernandez, Esq. 24 on May 31, 2022. "A general appearance or responsive pleading by a defendant that fails to 25 dispute personal jurisdiction will waive any defect in service or personal jurisdiction." Benny v. 26 27 Pipes, 799 F.2d 489, 492 (9th Cir. 1986) (citations omitted), amended on other grounds, 807 1 F.2d 1514 (9th Cir. 1987). 2 3 Nevertheless, out of an abundance of caution, Plaintiff is filing this Motion to Extend 4 Time to Serve the summons and amended complaint for an additional 60 days1. Plaintiff 5 contacted counsel for defendants requesting a stipulation to extend time or to sign an acceptance 6 of service. Counsel for defendants stated that he did not have authority to do either. 7

8 FRCP 6(b) states:

9 (b) Extending Time: 10 (1) In General. When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend 11 the time: (A) With or without motion or notice if the court acts, or if a request is made, before the 12 original time or its extension expires; or (B) On motion made after the time has expired if the party failed to act because of 13 excusable neglect. 14 The Ninth Circuit has held in Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 624 F.3d 1253, 1258-59 15 (9th Cir. 2010) that Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1) “ ‘[is] to be liberally construed to effectuate the 16 general purpose of seeing that cases are tried on the merits.’ Rodgers v. Watt, 722 F.2d 456, 459 17 18 (9th Cir.1983) (quoting Staren v. American Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, 529 F.2d 1257, 19 1263 (7th Cir.1976)); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 1 (“[The Federal Rules] should be construed and 20 administered to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and 21 proceeding.”). Consequently, requests for extensions of time made before the applicable deadline 22 has passed should “normally ... be granted in the absence of bad faith on the part of the party 23 24 25

26 1 This Court ordered Plaintiff to serve defendant CitiBank, N.A. on or before 21 days after the filing of the amended complaint. This Order was entered as docket no. 36. 27 seeking relief or prejudice to the adverse party.” 4B Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R.

9 || Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1165 (3d ed. 2004).” Id. 3 In this case, given the general appearance by Defendant CITIBANK, N.A., as Trustee of 4 |! the American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2004-3, Mortgage Backed Notes, Series 2004-3, > Plaintiff believes that service of process has already been effectuated or waived by Defendant. Nevertheless, based on the above, Plaintiff believes that good cause exists to extend time to serve the Defendant CITIBANK, N.A., as Trustee of the American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 9 2004-3, Mortgage Backed Notes, Series 2004-3 via traditional means. Plaintiff requests 60 days 19 || to do so. 11 Dated this 31*' day of May 2022. 12 /s/ Randal R. Leonard, Esq. B RANDAL R. LEONARD, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6716 14 2901 El Camino Avenue, #200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 15 (702) 598-3667/ office (702) 598-3926/ facsimile 16 Attorney for Plaintiff 17 18 ORDER 19 For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that ECF No. 46 is GRANTED. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED 5 : 8:50 am, June 03, 2022 Fr la wey 22 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28

DECLARATION OF COUNSEL 1

Comes now the undersigned counsel and states the following under penalty of perjury: 2 3 1. I am the counsel for the Plaintiff herein. 4 2. In and around the 23rd and 24th of May 2022, I entered into two stipulations to extend 5 time to answer the amended complaint filed herein and to file a supplemental brief as 6 directed by this Court pursuant to an Order entered as docket no. 36. 7 3. Counsel for Defendant Western Progressive Nevada, LLC stated that he and his firm was 8 also representing CITIBANK, N.A., as Trustee of the American Home Mortgage 9 10 Investment Trust 2004-3, Mortgage Backed Notes, Series 2004-3 (“CITIBANK”) as well 11 and specifically included CITIBANK in the stipulation to extend time to answer the 12 amended complaint and file a supplemental brief. 13 4. My understanding was that CITIBANK wanted to appear and participate in the filing of 14 the supplemental brief that was to be filed as well as participate in possible settlement 15 negotiations. 16 5. No mention was made regarding preserving the ability to object to jurisdiction or service 17 18 of process as required by FRCP 12(h) and therefore these defenses should be waived. 19 6. Further your declarant sayeth naught. 20 Dated this 31st day of May 2022.

21 /s/ Randal R. Leonard, Esq. 22 RANDAL R. LEONARD, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6716 23 2901 El Camino Avenue, #200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 24 (702) 598-3667/ office (702) 598-3926/ facsimile 25 Attorney for Plaintiff 26

27 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b), I certify that on this this 31st day of May 2022, I did 2 3 cause a true copy of MOTION TO EXTEND TIME to be e-served through the Court’s e-filing 4 electronic notice system to the attorney(s) associated with this case. 5 WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP 6 Christina V. Miller, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12448 7 Ramir M. Hernandez, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13146 8 7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 9 (702) 475-7964; Fax: (702) 946-1345 10 cmiller@wrightlegal.net Attorneys for Defendants Western Progressive-Nevada, Inc. and CITIBANK, N.A., as Trustee of 11 the American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2004-3, Mortgage Backed Notes, Series 2004-3

12 /s/ Randal R. Leonard, Esq. 13 RANDAL R. LEONARD, ESQ. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bankruptcy Estate of Diego M. Galietti v. Western Progressive-Nevada, Inc., (D. Nev. 2022).

Bankruptcy Estate of Diego M. Galietti v. Western Progressive-Nevada, Inc. (Bankruptcy Estate of Diego M. Galietti v. Western Progressive-Nevada, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related