Bankhead v. St. Louis Housing Authority

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bankhead v. St. Louis Housing Authority

882 S.W.2d 732, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1357, 1994 WL 449724

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 23, 1994·No. No. 65085·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, Kendell Smith, a minor, and Wil-listene Bankhead, his mother and next friend, appeal from a summary judgment entered by the circuit court in favor of defendant, St. Louis Housing Authority, on plaintiffs’ amended petition alleging negligent failure to repair.

The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, we have furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed according to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, Kendell Smith, a minor, and Wil-listene Bankhead, his mother and next friend, appeal from a summary judgment entered by the circuit court in favor of defendant, St. Louis Housing Authority, on plaintiffs’ amended petition alleging negligent failure to repair.

The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, we have furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed according to Rule 84.16(b).

Bankhead v. St. Louis Housing Authority, 882 S.W.2d 732, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1357, 1994 WL 449724 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

882 S.W.2d 732 (Bankhead v. St. Louis Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.