Bankers Trust Hudson Valley v. Bressman
435 N.E.2d 398, 56 N.Y.2d 565, 450 N.Y.S.2d 181, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3238
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. It was error as a matter of law to have denied the motion to dismiss where plaintiff deliberately chose not to serve the complaint within the prescribed time (see Barasch v Micucci, 49 NY2d 594).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bankers Trust Hudson Valley v. Bressman, 435 N.E.2d 398, 56 N.Y.2d 565, 450 N.Y.S.2d 181, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3238 (N.Y. 1982).
435 N.E.2d 398 (Bankers Trust Hudson Valley v. Bressman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wallace v. Suffolk County Police Department
809 F. Supp. 2d 73 (E.D. New York, 2011)
Felice Fedder Oriental Art, Inc. v. Scanlon
708 F. Supp. 551 (S.D. New York, 1989)
Luksic v. Killmer
100 A.D.2d 864 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)