Bankers Trust Hudson Valley v. Bressman

New York Court of Appeals

Bankers Trust Hudson Valley v. Bressman

435 N.E.2d 398, 56 N.Y.2d 565, 450 N.Y.S.2d 181, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3238

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 25, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 435 N.E.2d 398 (Bankers Trust Hudson Valley v. Bressman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bankers Trust Hudson Valley v. Bressman, 435 N.E.2d 398, 56 N.Y.2d 565, 450 N.Y.S.2d 181, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3238 (N.Y. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. It was error as a matter of law to have denied the motion to dismiss where plaintiff deliberately chose not to serve the complaint within the prescribed time (see Barasch v Micucci, 49 NY2d 594).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. It was error as a matter of law to have denied the motion to dismiss where plaintiff deliberately chose not to serve the complaint within the prescribed time (see Barasch v Micucci, 49 NY2d 594).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

435 N.E.2d 398, 56 N.Y.2d 565, 450 N.Y.S.2d 181, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bankers-trust-hudson-valley-v-bressman-ny-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack