Bankers Trust Co. v. Wagner

Ohio Supreme Court

Bankers Trust Co. v. Wagner

763 N.E.2d 611, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1481

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 1, 2002

Docket02-255

StatusPublished

This text of 763 N.E.2d 611 (Bankers Trust Co. v. Wagner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bankers Trust Co. v. Wagner, 763 N.E.2d 611, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1481 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Allen App. Nos. 1-01-100, 1-01-102, 1-01-103, 1-01-104, 1-01-105, 1-01-106, 1-01-107, 1-01-108, 1-01-109,1-01-110, 1-01-111, 1-01-112, 1-01-113, 1-01-194, 1-01-95, 1-01-96, 1-01-97, 1-01-98 and 1-01- 99. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellants’ motion for stay of execution of foreclosure, without requirement of bond, pending outcome of appeal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen App. Nos. 1-01-100, 1-01-102, 1-01-103, 1-01-104, 1-01-105, 1-01-106, 1-01-107, 1-01-108, 1-01-109,1-01-110, 1-01-111, 1-01-112, 1-01-113, 1-01-194, 1-01-95, 1-01-96, 1-01-97, 1-01-98 and 1-01- 99. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellants’ motion for stay of execution of foreclosure, without requirement of bond, pending outcome of appeal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

763 N.E.2d 611, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bankers-trust-co-v-wagner-ohio-2002.