Bankers Trust Co. v. Nagler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bankers Trust Co. v. Nagler

23 A.D.2d 645, 257 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4650

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bankers Trust Co. v. Nagler. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 A.D.2d 477 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 1965·Published

Opinion

Order, entered December 6, 1962, unanimously affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-respondent. We agree with Special Term that the provisions of former Civil Practice Act (see § 1518 [subd. 9-a]) did not authorize the taxation by the defendant of the fees paid and loss of interest incurred in connection with the deposit of funds with the City Treasurer to secure a stay of execution. We do not reach the question of whether either of such items would be taxable as disbursements under CPLR 8301 (subd. [a], par. 12). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Yalente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ, [38 Misc 2d 574.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered December 6, 1962, unanimously affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-respondent. We agree with Special Term that the provisions of former Civil Practice Act (see § 1518 [subd. 9-a]) did not authorize the taxation by the defendant of the fees paid and loss of interest incurred in connection with the deposit of funds with the City Treasurer to secure a stay of execution. We do not reach the question of whether either of such items would be taxable as disbursements under CPLR 8301 (subd. [a], par. 12). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Yalente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ, [38 Misc 2d 574.]

Bankers Trust Co. v. Nagler, 23 A.D.2d 645, 257 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4650 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

23 A.D.2d 645 (Bankers Trust Co. v. Nagler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related