Bankers Trust Co. v. International Railway Co.

206 A.D. 737

This text of 206 A.D. 737 (Bankers Trust Co. v. International Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bankers Trust Co. v. International Railway Co., 206 A.D. 737 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

While ordinarily the opening and closing addresses of counsel have no place in a record upon appeal, we think that in the ease before us the discretion of this court should be exercised in granting the motion for the insertion of the summation, as showing the theory upon which the case was presented to the jury, and, therefore, as a help to the court in determining the appeal. (See Matter of Eno, 182 App. Div. 889.) The orders appealed from should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs, and the motion granted. Present—Clarke, P. J., Smith, Merrell and Martin, JJ. Orders reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Eno
182 A.D. 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 A.D. 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bankers-trust-co-v-international-railway-co-nyappdiv-1923.