Bankers Trust Co. v. International Railway Co.

206 A.D. 737
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bankers Trust Co. v. International Railway Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 207 A.D. 579

Opinion

Per Curiam:

While ordinarily the opening and closing addresses of counsel have no place in a record upon appeal, we think that in the ease before us the discretion of this court should be exercised in granting the motion for the insertion of the summation, as showing the theory upon which the case was presented to the jury, and, therefore, as a help to the court in determining the appeal. (See Matter of Eno, 182 App. Div. 889.) The orders appealed from should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs, and the motion granted. Present—Clarke, P. J., Smith, Merrell and Martin, JJ. Orders reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bankers Trust Co. v. International Railway Co., 206 A.D. 737 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

206 A.D. 737 (Bankers Trust Co. v. International Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Eno
182 A.D. 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)