Bankers Trust Co. v. Braten

194 A.D.2d 378, 598 N.Y.S.2d 498
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 8, 1993·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly S. Cohen, J.), entered on or about January 14 and 28, 1993, respectively, holding nonparty appellants in [379]*379contempt and imposing fines, unanimously affirmed, with costs and a sanction of $1,500 imposed upon appellants jointly and severally, payable to plaintiff.

The standard form subpoenas served on appellants did specify the date, location, name of the law firm before whom defendants were requested to appear and time of the deposition, and we deem the statute to have been complied with. It is noteworthy that appellants did not move to quash the subpoenas and only raised this flaw four months after first being held in contempt.

As appellants offer no other excuse for their failure to appear at the deposition, they were properly held in contempt. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bankers Trust Co. v. Braten, 194 A.D.2d 378, 598 N.Y.S.2d 498 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

194 A.D.2d 378 (Bankers Trust Co. v. Braten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wenig Saltiel, LLP v. Bozeman
76 Misc. 3d 135(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Patterson
2021 NY Slip Op 06535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Baralan International, S.p.A. v. Avant Industries, Ltd.
242 A.D.2d 226 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)