Bankers Life Insurance v. Stephens
This text of 74 N.W. 34 (Bankers Life Insurance v. Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
January 20,1892, tbe Bankers Life Insurance Company of Lincoln, Nebraska, and Thomas L. Stephens entered into a contract in writing in and by which Stephens was appointed agent of the insurance company for an indefinite time. The contract was in words and figures as follows:
“Thomas L. Stephens, Glenwood, loica: You are hereby appointed an agent of the Bankers Life Insurance Company of Nebraska, for field work under the management of said company, with authority to secure applications [661]*661fox’ insurance, collect and remit first prexxxiums, and to perform suclx other dnties as may be required of you in this behalf, subject to all the rules and regulations of this conxpany and such other instrxxctions as shall be coxnxmxixicated to yoxx from time to tixne by said conxpany. It shall be your duty:
“First — To thoroughly inform yourself of the company’s plans and advantages, and to make them publicly known throughout the limits of your agency.
“Second — -To use your best efforts and your greatest skill in promoting the company’s business by canvassing personally for acceptable applications for insurance in said company, and ixx guarding its interests generally.
“Third — To receive all xnoneys and other securities received by yoxx on account of said company in a fiduciary trust, and traxxsmit the same to the home office at once, together with a report in detail, embracing every item of business done by or through you not previously reported.
“Fourth — To execute and maintain in behalf of said coxxxpany a bond in the sum of $500, with good and sufficient sureños, conditioned for the faithful performance of all your obligations under this appoiixtmexxt.
“You are not authorized to alter, make, or discharge contracts, or to biixd the company in any way.
“The compensation to be allowed for services properly rendered under this appointment shall be a commission upon the premiums actually collected and remitted upon the policies secxxred by it through you as follows: Sixty per cent of the first year premiums on fifteen and twenty payment life, twenty year endowmexxt, ordinary life, ten year renewal, and twenty year bond; fifty per cent on ten payxnent life and fifteen year endowment. Also a ten per cent annual rexxewal interest on each policy written by or through yoxx for four years succeeding the first year, and this shall be construed to mean that a ten per cent renewal interest shall be paid each year for four years on all policies written by or through you when premi[662]*662ums have been collected and paid for, said four years to commence one year from date of policy. (But all your interest under this contract shall cease at any time your connection with this company is severed, except that if such severance is made bv the company you shall be entitled to, and the company hereby agrees to pay you, two annual renewals of ten per cent each on all premiums collected and paid for on all policies written by or through you or your sub-agents, such payment being in lieu of the four ten per cent annual renewals specified herein.) Neither sickness or death shall annul any of your interest under this contract.
“You are hereby authorized to hire sub-agents, and any difference between what you pay them and your contract will be credited to your account.
“This appointment may be revoked at any time upon one year’s previous notice in writing, should you fail to comply with any of its conditions, or should the amount of new business secured by you not prove remunerative, or should the business not be conducted in a satisfactory manner.
“For the first fifteen months we will give you a salary of $200 per month, and should your income from the commission part of your contract run more than your salary, you shall be entitled to the benefit of the same. In consideration of the contract as a whole, you agree to turn into the company of insurance accepted and paid for $200,000 the first fifteen months in any or all of the following kinds of policies: Ten, fifteen, and twenty payment life; fifteen and twenty year endowment; twenty year bond; ten, fifteen, and twenty payment life', with extended insurance.
“I hereby accept the foregoing appointment and agree to comply with its terms and conditions.”
In the district court of Lancaster county Stephens brought this suit against the insurance company, alleging that he entered upon the duties contracted to be performed by him by virtue of such contract and continued [663]*663in tlie performance of sncli duties for-the insurance company for a period of ten months immediately after January 20, 1892; that at the end of that time the insurance company, having wholly failed to perform its part of the agreement, wrongfully discharged him from its employ, and then and thereafter refused to permit him to longer continue in its employ; that he was at all times during; the fifteen months immediately following the date of such contract able, ready, and willing, and repeatedly offeied and held himself out as being ready and. willing, to do and perform all the duties and obligations required of him by said contract. By this action Stephens sought to recover from 'the insurance company fifteen months’ salary at $200 per month. He had a verdict and judgment, and the insurance company brings the case here for review on error.
The only contention of the plaintiff in error, which we notice, is that the district court erred in the construction placed by it upon the contract between the parties, The insuianee company's construction of the contract is that Stephens was to be paid for the first fifteen months of his employment, a compensation at the rate of $200 per month, provided that during said time he wrote and turned into the insurance company risks accepted by the company, and on which the premiums had been paid, aggregating $200,000. On the other hand, Stephens’ construction of the contract Ayas and is that in any event he should be paid a compensation of $200 per month for the first fifteen months that he served the company and the commissions provided by the contract on all risks procured during that time. A further contention of Stephens Avas that this salary of $200 per month was payable monthly. The district court adopted the construction of the contract contended for by Stephens. We are of ' opinion that the construction placed upon the contract by the district court was the correct one, and its judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 N.W. 34, 53 Neb. 660, 1898 Neb. LEXIS 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bankers-life-insurance-v-stephens-neb-1898.