Bankers Insurance Co. v. Rojas

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bankers Insurance Co. v. Rojas

855 So. 2d 1252, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15453

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 15, 2003

DocketNos. 4D02-150, 4D02-151

StatusPublished

This text of 855 So. 2d 1252 (Bankers Insurance Co. v. Rojas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bankers Insurance Co. v. Rojas, 855 So. 2d 1252, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15453 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

FARMER, C.J.

This is an epilogue to our decision in Bankers Ins. Co. v. General No-Fault Ins., Inc., 814 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), rev. denied, 835 So.2d 265 (Fla.2002). The subject of today’s appeal is attorneys fees. In light of our disposition of the appeal on the merits, we hereby reverse the award of fees to General No-Fault from Bankers. As to the award of fees to the insureds from Bankers, and in light of the concession of counsel, we remand to the trial court to reduce the amount of the fees awarded by the number of hours for the defense of the suit against the other driver. In all other respects we find no error in the award of fees to the insureds and hereby affirm on all other issues.

KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FARMER, C.J.

This is an epilogue to our decision in Bankers Ins. Co. v. General No-Fault Ins., Inc., 814 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), rev. denied, 835 So.2d 265 (Fla.2002). The subject of today’s appeal is attorneys fees. In light of our disposition of the appeal on the merits, we hereby reverse the award of fees to General No-Fault from Bankers. As to the award of fees to the insureds from Bankers, and in light of the concession of counsel, we remand to the trial court to reduce the amount of the fees awarded by the number of hours for the defense of the suit against the other driver. In all other respects we find no error in the award of fees to the insureds and hereby affirm on all other issues.

KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

855 So. 2d 1252, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bankers-insurance-co-v-rojas-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack