Bankers Commercial Corp. v. Alto, Inc.

30 A.D.2d 517, 289 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4025
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 14, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 30 A.D.2d 517 (Bankers Commercial Corp. v. Alto, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bankers Commercial Corp. v. Alto, Inc., 30 A.D.2d 517, 289 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4025 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Order entered on January 17, 1968, confirming report of a Special Referee and denying motion of defendant to dismiss complaint for lack of jurisdiction, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, with $50 costs and disbursements to defendant, and complaint dismissed. Both acceptance and delivery of the basic agreement between the party corporations was effected in Virginia, where defendant, a Virginia corporation conducted a substantial part of its business activity and where it could normally be found. All of defendant’s contacts with plaintiff, a New York corporation, were by telephone, mail or by visits of the plaintiff’s representatives to the defendant’s office in Virginia. The two visits of defendant’s representative to plaintiff in New York were either for social reasons or to discuss a settlement of differences. The fact that payments of moneys due under that assigned conditional sales contract were to be made and in fact were partially made in New York is insufficient to confer jurisdiction. Alone, such contacts with this State do not constitute purposeful acts sufficient to sustain jurisdiction. (Hubbard, Westervelt & Mottelay v. Harsh Bldg. Co., 28 A D 2d 295; Wirth v. Prenyl, 8. A., 29 A D 2d 373.) Concur—Stevens, J. P., Steuer, McGivern, Rabin and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mahtani v. C. Ramon, Inc.
168 A.D.2d 371 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Beacon Enterprises, Inc. v. Mary Rose Menzies
715 F.2d 757 (Second Circuit, 1983)
Faravelli v. Bankers Trust Co.
85 A.D.2d 335 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Plaza Realty Investors v. Bailey
484 F. Supp. 335 (S.D. New York, 1979)
Pneuma-Flo Systems, Inc. v. Universal MacHinery Corp.
454 F. Supp. 858 (S.D. New York, 1978)
Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Schneider
435 F. Supp. 742 (S.D. New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 A.D.2d 517, 289 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bankers-commercial-corp-v-alto-inc-nyappdiv-1968.