BankAtlantic v. Kantor

757 So. 2d 1214, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1374, 2000 WL 159117
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 16, 2000·No. No. 3D99-550·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order dismissing the Fourth Amended Complaint with prejudice is entirely reversed upon the determination that every claim asserted by the plaintiff is sufficient to state a claim upon which relief can properly be granted against the respective defendants. See HTP, Ltd. v. Lineas Aereas Costarricenses, S.A., 685 So.2d 1238 (Fla.1996); Moransais v. Heathman, 744 So.2d 973 (Fla.1999); Pershing Indus., Inc. v. Estate of Sanz, 740 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); First Equity Corp. of Florida, Inc. v. Watkins, (Fla. 3d DCA Case Nos. 98-851 & 98-589, opinion filed, July 28, 1999) [24 FLW D1758]; Adams v. Chenowith, 349 So.2d 230 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); § 607.1106(1)(d), Fla. Stat. (1993). The cause is remanded with directions to deny the motions to dismiss and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BankAtlantic v. Kantor, 757 So. 2d 1214, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1374, 2000 WL 159117 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

757 So. 2d 1214 (BankAtlantic v. Kantor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. Chenowith
349 So. 2d 230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Moransais v. Heathman
744 So. 2d 973 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
HTP, Ltd. v. Lineas Aereas Costarricenses
685 So. 2d 1238 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
PERSHING IND., INC. v. Estate of Sanz
740 So. 2d 1246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)