Bank v. Spell
20 S.C.L. 366
This text of 20 S.C.L. 366 (Bank v. Spell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bank v. Spell, 20 S.C.L. 366 (S.C. Ct. App. 1834).
Opinion
An agreement by the drawer and endorsers of a bill with the holder, before the bill became due, that the holder should take any security that the acceptor could give, or make any arrangement he thought proper to secure the payment, without affecting their liabilities, does not dispense with the necessity of a demand on the acceptor, and notice of non-payment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
20 S.C.L. 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-v-spell-scctapp-1834.