Bank v. . Shuford

169 S.E. 226, 204 N.C. 796, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 292
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 10, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 169 S.E. 226 (Bank v. . Shuford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bank v. . Shuford, 169 S.E. 226, 204 N.C. 796, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 292 (N.C. 1933).

Opinion

Summary proceeding in ejectment, commenced in the court of a justice of the peace, and tried de novo on appeal to the Superior Court of Catawba County, where verdict and judgment were rendered for plaintiffs, from which the defendant, K. J. Ingle, appeals. Error is assigned (1) "to the issues as answered by the jury"; (2) "to the refusal of the court to set aside the verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence"; and (3) "to the judgment as signed by the court."

The only error suggested in appellant's brief is the refusal of the court to set aside the verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence. This was a matter addressed to the discretion of the trial court, and is not reviewable on appeal. Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N.C. 808,161 S.E. 686; Whitted v. Fuquay, 127 N.C. 68, 37 S.E. 141.

Affirmed. *Page 797

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Query v. Gate City Life Insurance
11 S.E.2d 139 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 S.E. 226, 204 N.C. 796, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-v-shuford-nc-1933.