Bank v. . Shuford
This text of 169 S.E. 226 (Bank v. . Shuford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Summary proceeding in ejectment, commenced in the court of a justice of the peace, and tried de novo on appeal to the Superior Court of Catawba County, where verdict and judgment were rendered for plaintiffs, from which the defendant, K. J. Ingle, appeals. Error is assigned (1) "to the issues as answered by the jury"; (2) "to the refusal of the court to set aside the verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence"; and (3) "to the judgment as signed by the court."
The only error suggested in appellant's brief is the refusal of the court to set aside the verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence. This was a matter addressed to the discretion of the trial court, and is not reviewable on appeal. Goodman v. Goodman,
Affirmed. *Page 797
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 S.E. 226, 204 N.C. 796, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-v-shuford-nc-1933.