Bank v. Rider

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Bank v. Rider

58 N.H. 512

DecidedMarch 5, 1879

StatusPublished

This text of 58 N.H. 512 (Bank v. Rider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank v. Rider, 58 N.H. 512 (N.H. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

Stanley, J.

The instructions requested were properly refused. They lacked an essential qualification. If the plaintiffs had reasonable cause to believe that N. did not assent to the endorsement, or if the circumstances at the time they took the note were such as to put them on inquiiy whether N. assented to the endorsement, they were bound to inquire, and would be charged with knowledge of all they would have learned on such inquiry. Warren v. Swett, 31 N. H. 332; Dow v. Sayward, 14 N. H. 9. The instructions given were correct. Wagner v. Freschl, 56 N. H. 495.

Judgment on the verdict.

Smith, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanley, J.

The instructions requested were properly refused. They lacked an essential qualification. If the plaintiffs had reasonable cause to believe that N. did not assent to the endorsement, or if the circumstances at the time they took the note were such as to put them on inquiiy whether N. assented to the endorsement, they were bound to inquire, and would be charged with knowledge of all they would have learned on such inquiry. Warren v. Swett, 31 N. H. 332; Dow v. Sayward, 14 N. H. 9. The instructions given were correct. Wagner v. Freschl, 56 N. H. 495.

Judgment on the verdict.

Smith, J., did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 N.H. 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-v-rider-nh-1879.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack