Bank v. . McCall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Bank v. . McCall

166 S.E. 927, 203 N.C. 848, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 110

DecidedOctober 26, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 166 S.E. 927 (Bank v. . McCall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank v. . McCall, 166 S.E. 927, 203 N.C. 848, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 110 (N.C. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Civil action to recover on a promissory note executed by the defendants. *Page 849

The defendants set up a counterclaim alleging usury and asked for an accounting.

There was a reference under the statute, and on exceptions to the referee's report, judgment was entered for the plaintiff. Defendants appeal, assigning errors. No reversible error has been made to appear on the record, hence the judgment will be upheld.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Civil action to recover on a promissory note executed by the defendants. *Page 849

The defendants set up a counterclaim alleging usury and asked for an accounting.

There was a reference under the statute, and on exceptions to the referee's report, judgment was entered for the plaintiff. Defendants appeal, assigning errors. No reversible error has been made to appear on the record, hence the judgment will be upheld.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 S.E. 927, 203 N.C. 848, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-v-mccall-nc-1932.