Bank v. Fallon
This text of 255 A.D. 874 (Bank v. Fallon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained by Sarah Bank, Edith Kahn and Phyllis Bank; for property damage sustained by Sarah Bank; and for loss of services sustained by Herman Bank, the husband of Sarah Bank, and for medical expenses, etc., for his daughter Phyllis, and for loss of services sustained by Pred Kahn, the husband of Edith Kahn. Judgment dismissing complaint on the merits unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 A.D. 874, 8 N.Y.S.2d 124, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-v-fallon-nyappdiv-1938.