Bank v. Bockrath
This text of 966 A.2d 347 (Bank v. Bockrath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CITIZENS BANK, Plaintiff Below-Appellant,
v.
NANCY L. BOCKRATH, Defendant Below-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
Before BERGER, JACOBS, and RIDGELY, Justices.
ORDER
HENRY DUPONT RIDGELY, Justice.
This 22nd day of January 2009, after careful consideration of the parties' briefs and the record on appeal, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court's well-reasoned decision dated July 30, 2008. The Superior Court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorneys' fees to defendant, Nancy L. Bockrath, under the bad faith exception to the American Rule.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
966 A.2d 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-v-bockrath-del-2009.