Home/Michigan Supreme Court/Bank One v. Condit

Bank One v. Condit

708 N.W.2d 401, 474 Mich. 1024
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 30, 2006·No. 129123·Published

Opinion

708 N.W.2d 401 (2006)
474 Mich. 1024

BANK ONE, NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Timothy B. CONDIT, Defendant-Appellant, and
Craig A. Kolmer and William K. Newcomb, Jr., Defendants.

Docket Nos. 129123 & (49)(50), COA No. 257626.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 30, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 16, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for immediate consideration and peremptory reversal are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bank One v. Condit, 708 N.W.2d 401, 474 Mich. 1024 (Mich. 2006).

708 N.W.2d 401 (Bank One v. Condit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.