Bank One NA v. Richardson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 14, 2003
Docket02-60213
StatusUnpublished

This text of Bank One NA v. Richardson (Bank One NA v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bank One NA v. Richardson, (5th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 14, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III _______________________ Clerk

Consolidated Cases Nos. 02-60159, 02-60166, 02-60204, 02-60206, 02-60213 _______________________

Case No. 02-60159

BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

TYRONE DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60166

ROBERT BLACKMON, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60204

LEADNER HACKETT, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60206 BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

GWENDOLYN DIXON, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60213

ISSAC RICHARDSON, JR., also known as Issac Richardson, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (3:01-CV-74-WS) __________________________________________

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellants challenge the district court’s rulings

granting Bank One’s motions to compel arbitration and to stay the

Appellants’ pending state law claims. This case is

indistinguishable from those that we reviewed and ruled on in the

related cases of Bank One, N.A. v. Boyd1 and Bank One, N.A. v.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 1 288 F.3d 181 (5th Cir. 2002).

2 Lake.2 For essentially the same reasons that are set forth in our

opinion in Boyd and in the district court’s opinion in Bank One,

N.A. v. Coates,3 and Bank One, N.A. v. Taylor,4 the judgments of the

district court in these cases are, in all respects, AFFIRMED.

2 No. 01-60051 (5th Cir. April 5, 2002) (unpublished). 3 125 F. Supp. 2d 819 (S.D. Miss. 2001). 4 No. 4:01CV15-D-B (N.D. Miss. May 7, 2002) (order granting petition to compel arbitration).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bank One, N.A. v. Boyd
288 F.3d 181 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
Bank One, N.A. v. Coates
125 F. Supp. 2d 819 (S.D. Mississippi, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bank One NA v. Richardson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-one-na-v-richardson-ca5-2003.