Bank One, Corp. v. Bornschein

987 So. 2d 172, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 10853, 2008 WL 2744370
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 16, 2008·No. No. 4D07-2536·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion for attorney’s fees based upon both an offer of settlement and section 57.105, Florida Statutes. While the order does not make any findings of fact as to whether the offer qualified or was made in good faith, such findings are not required under the offer of judgment statute. Evans v. Piotraczk, 724 So.2d 1210, 1213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). There is no transcript of the hearing where the court denied the motion, and we cannot determine whether the trial court’s ruling was an abuse of its discretion. Without this we must affirm. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150,1152 (Fla.1979).

WARNER, MAY, JJ., and BIDWILL, MARTIN J., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bank One, Corp. v. Bornschein, 987 So. 2d 172, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 10853, 2008 WL 2744370 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

987 So. 2d 172 (Bank One, Corp. v. Bornschein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Key West Seaside, LLC v. Certified Lower Keys Plumbing, Inc.
208 So. 3d 718 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Raza v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
100 So. 3d 121 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)