Bank of Waynesboro v. Healing Springs Merc. Co.

50 So. 882, 163 Ala. 495, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 554
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 30, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 So. 882 (Bank of Waynesboro v. Healing Springs Merc. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bank of Waynesboro v. Healing Springs Merc. Co., 50 So. 882, 163 Ala. 495, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 554 (Ala. 1909).

Opinion

MAYFIELD, J.

Appellant sued appellees as individuals and as a partnership. The suit was upon a promissory note, signed by the partnership, per one of the defendants as manager, and indorsed by the other. The defendants admitted the execution of the note as above described. Defendants filed pleas denying the partnership, but alleging that Healing Springs Mercantile Company was an individual business, owned by one M. A. J. Loper, and managed by John F. Loper. Appellant filed replications to these pleas, setting up [499]*499that the parties by their acts had estopped themselves from denying the existence of their liability as partners. Demurrers were sustained to these replications. Trial was had upon the special pleas and the general issue.

The undisputed evidence showed that plaintiff was entitled to the general affirmative charge. The trial court, however, excluded all the plaintiff’s evidence, and gave the general affirmative charge for the defendants. Upon what theory this could have been done it is impossible to conceive. The special pleas of defendants were wholly insufficient. Those attempting to deny the partnership were not even colorable as a defense against the defendants individually. The plea setting up that plaintiff was a foreign corporation was wholly insufficient as an answer to the complaint. If the pleas had been good, the replications, as the evidence indisputable shows, would have been perfect answer to the pleas.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Dowdell, G. J., and Simpson and Anderson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guin v. Grasselli Chemical Co.
72 So. 413 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 So. 882, 163 Ala. 495, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-waynesboro-v-healing-springs-merc-co-ala-1909.