Bank of Washington v. Moreland

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bank of Washington v. Moreland

202 S.W.3d 711, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1384, 2006 WL 2671361

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 19, 2006

DocketED 87498

StatusPublished

This text of 202 S.W.3d 711 (Bank of Washington v. Moreland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of Washington v. Moreland, 202 S.W.3d 711, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1384, 2006 WL 2671361 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Deborah A. Moreland (“Moreland”) appeals the judgment of the trial court in favor of Bank of Washington (“Bank”) on its action for a deficiency. Moreland argues that there was no evidence of a commercially reasonable sale of the collateral to support the judgment.

*712 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Deborah A. Moreland (“Moreland”) appeals the judgment of the trial court in favor of Bank of Washington (“Bank”) on its action for a deficiency. Moreland argues that there was no evidence of a commercially reasonable sale of the collateral to support the judgment.

*712 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 S.W.3d 711, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1384, 2006 WL 2671361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-washington-v-moreland-moctapp-2006.