Bank of Washington v. Kurtz
2 D.C. 110
This text of 2 D.C. 110 (Bank of Washington v. Kurtz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bank of Washington v. Kurtz, 2 D.C. 110 (circtddc 1815).
Opinion
refused to permit the notary public to give parol evidence of the contents of his letter to the defendant, who was the indorser of George Frank’s promissory note, without previous notice to the defendant to produce the original letter, on the authority of Underwood v. Huddlestone, [ante, 76,] June term, 1813. Quare ?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 D.C. 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-washington-v-kurtz-circtddc-1815.