Bank of Utica v. Root
4 Hill & Den. 535
CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
DecidedJune 15, 1842
StatusPublished
This text of 4 Hill & Den. 535 (Bank of Utica v. Root) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bank of Utica v. Root, 4 Hill & Den. 535 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1842).
Opinion
By the Court,
The affidavit was defective in not pursuing the language of the rule, (22 Wend. 644,)
Ordered accordingly.
See Fitzburgh v. Truax, (1 Hill, 644, and note;) also Calder v. Lansing, (id. 212;) Richmond v. Cowles, (2 id. 359;) and the note to Britian v. Peabody, ante, p. 64, 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Hill & Den. 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-utica-v-root-nycterr-1842.