Bank of Utica v. Finch

New York Court of Chancery

Bank of Utica v. Finch

1 Barb. Ch. 75

CourtNew York Court of Chancery

DecidedSeptember 1, 1845

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Barb. Ch. 75 (Bank of Utica v. Finch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of Utica v. Finch, 1 Barb. Ch. 75 (N.Y. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor

decided that a person who purchases property from a defendant in a foreclosure suit, .after the bill has been taken as confessed against him, takes such property subject to all the rights of the complainant; and is bound by the admission made by such defendant in suffering the bill to-be taken as confessed against him. That where an original bill is taken as confessed, and an amended bill is subsequently filed, making other persons parties, the order pro confesso is thereby opened.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor

decided that a person who purchases property from a defendant in a foreclosure suit, .after the bill has been taken as confessed against him, takes such property subject to all the rights of the complainant; and is bound by the admission made by such defendant in suffering the bill to-be taken as confessed against him. That where an original bill is taken as confessed, and an amended bill is subsequently filed, making other persons parties, the order pro confesso is thereby opened.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Barb. Ch. 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-utica-v-finch-nychanct-1845.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack