Bank of United States v. Schultz
This text of 2 Ohio 470 (Bank of United States v. Schultz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court were unanimously of opinion that a court of equity might properly interfere to prevent a sale of land upon execution, where such sale would not at law confer a title on the purchaser. And its only consequence would be to embarrass the title of the complainants. Upon the merits of the case arising on the construction of the provisions of the statutes, the court were equally divided in opinion. Consequently the bill was dismissed.
Note by the Editor. — Reaffirmed, iii. 73; v. 48, 178; S. P. xvi. 574.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Ohio 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-united-states-v-schultz-ohio-1826.