Bank of United States v. Kurtz

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Bank of United States v. Kurtz

2 F. Cas. 702, 2 D.C. 342, 2 Cranch 342

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedOctober 15, 1822

StatusPublished

This text of 2 F. Cas. 702 (Bank of United States v. Kurtz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of United States v. Kurtz, 2 F. Cas. 702, 2 D.C. 342, 2 Cranch 342 (circtddc 1822).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff having been served with notice to produce the plaintiff’s books, the-defendant’s counsel moved the Court, just as the cause was called for trial, for judgment of nonsuit, under the 15th section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, [1 Stat. at Large, 73,] for not producing the books.

Mr. Key, for the defendant,

contended that he was yet in time to make the motion for an order to produce the books: and that notice of the motion was not necessary as there had been a notice served on the plaintiff to produce them at the last term; he accordingly now made the motion ; but it being the last time of calling the docket, and the cause being called for trial, the Court continued it to the next term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff having been served with notice to produce the plaintiff’s books, the-defendant’s counsel moved the Court, just as the cause was called for trial, for judgment of nonsuit, under the 15th section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, [1 Stat. at Large, 73,] for not producing the books.

Mr. Key, for the defendant,

contended that he was yet in time to make the motion for an order to produce the books: and that notice of the motion was not necessary as there had been a notice served on the plaintiff to produce them at the last term; he accordingly now made the motion ; but it being the last time of calling the docket, and the cause being called for trial, the Court continued it to the next term.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 F. Cas. 702, 2 D.C. 342, 2 Cranch 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-united-states-v-kurtz-circtddc-1822.