Bank of Topeka v. Eaton

107 F. 1003, 47 C.C.A. 140, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4053
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedApril 5, 1901
DocketNo. 342
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 107 F. 1003 (Bank of Topeka v. Eaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bank of Topeka v. Eaton, 107 F. 1003, 47 C.C.A. 140, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4053 (1st Cir. 1901).

Opinion

TER CURIAM.

This court concurs in the reasoning of Judge Putnam, holding that the declaration is insufficient and sustaining the demurrer. Our conclusion therefore is, and it is so ordered, that the judgment of the circuit court he affirmed, with costs for the defendants in error. 100 Fed. 8. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs for the defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Victor Refining Co. v. City Nat. Bank of Commerce
263 S.W. 622 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 F. 1003, 47 C.C.A. 140, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-topeka-v-eaton-ca1-1901.