Bank of Topeka v. Eaton
107 F. 1003, 47 C.C.A. 140, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4053
Opinion
This court concurs in the reasoning of Judge Putnam, holding that the declaration is insufficient and sustaining the demurrer. Our conclusion therefore is, and it is so ordered, that the judgment of the circuit court he affirmed, with costs for the defendants in error. 100 Fed. 8. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs for the defendants in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bank of Topeka v. Eaton, 107 F. 1003, 47 C.C.A. 140, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4053 (1st Cir. 1901).
107 F. 1003 (Bank of Topeka v. Eaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Victor Refining Co. v. City Nat. Bank of Commerce
263 S.W. 622 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1924)