Bank of the United States v. Strong
9 Wend. 451
Opinion
By the Court,
It has not been usual to allow -costs on such motions, and therefore none will be granted in this case. But, for the future, costs will be granted where a rule for consolidation is ordered, unless a satisfactory reason is shewn for bringing two suits, where the whole demands might have been embraced in one suit
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bank of the United States v. Strong, 9 Wend. 451 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1832).
9 Wend. 451 (Bank of the United States v. Strong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gillin v. Canary
19 Misc. 594 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Curtis v. Baldwin
42 N.H. 398 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1861)
Dunning v. Bank of Auburn
19 Wend. 23 (New York Supreme Court, 1837)