Bank of the United States v. Moore

2 F. Cas. 726, 3 Cranch 330, 3 D.C. 330
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided May 15, 1828·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

THE COURT

delivered the following opinion, (nem. con.):—

Upon the above state of the case, the court is of opinion that the plaintiffs cannot recover in this action. The indorsement to the Bank of Columbia, the then last indorsee, being filled up before the commencement of the suit, the Bank of the United States had no legal cause of action upon the note when the suit was brought. The subsequent in-dorsement by Mr. Frye, as president of the Bank of Columbia, (if he had authority to indorse it, on which point the court gives no opinion,) did not alter the plaintiffs’ legal cause of action at the time the suit was brought. It could only authorize a new action; and, even if it would support this suit, it was not filled up when offered in evidence upon the last trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bank of the United States v. Moore, 2 F. Cas. 726, 3 Cranch 330, 3 D.C. 330 (circtddc 1828).

2 F. Cas. 726 (Bank of the United States v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Capital Traction Co. v. Hof
174 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1899)
Miller v. Grice
30 S.C.L. 147 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1844)
Burgess v. Heape
10 S.C. Eq. 397 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1833)
Ex Parte Tobias Watkins
28 U.S. 193 (Supreme Court, 1830)