Bank of the United States v. Macdonald
This text of 2 F. Cas. 717 (Bank of the United States v. Macdonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(nem. con., but THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, doubting) refused to give this instruction also, there being no evidence that Agg’s note was taken in renewal of the note of Prentiss’s, indorsed by the defendant.
Verdict for plaintiffs, a new trial was granted by consent and at March term, 1836, the plaintiff struck the suit off, by consent, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 F. Cas. 717, 4 Cranch 624, 4 D.C. 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-the-united-states-v-macdonald-circtddc-1835.