Bank of the United States v. Johnson

2 F. Cas. 701, 3 Cranch 228, 3 D.C. 228

This text of 2 F. Cas. 701 (Bank of the United States v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bank of the United States v. Johnson, 2 F. Cas. 701, 3 Cranch 228, 3 D.C. 228 (circtddc 1827).

Opinion

THE COURT

(MORSELL, [Circuit Judge,] contra)

was of opinion that it was not the same cause of action. The bond, plea, and judgment of the court having been read to the jury by Mr. Jones, without objection, before the court had given that opinion.

[702]*702Mr. Swann, for the plaintiffs, moved the court to instruct the jury that the papers so read to them were not evidence properly before them; and

THE COURT (MORSELL, [Circuit Judge,] contra) so instructed them.

Verdict for plaintiffs, $5,743.26, with interest from 19th December, 1825.

Bills of exception were taken, but no writ of error was prosecuted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 F. Cas. 701, 3 Cranch 228, 3 D.C. 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-the-united-states-v-johnson-circtddc-1827.