Bank of the United States v. Broadfoot

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Bank of the United States v. Broadfoot

15 S.C.L. 30

DecidedFebruary 15, 1826

StatusPublished

This text of 15 S.C.L. 30 (Bank of the United States v. Broadfoot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of the United States v. Broadfoot, 15 S.C.L. 30 (S.C. Ct. App. 1826).

Pincite

Opinion

Iii this Case it wás decided, that where one of several jjáf triers is resident here or'within the jurisdiction of the Court', the absent copartner cannot be made a party defendant in'a process against the firm, by attachment either directed against his private".property, or the property of the firm, arid that the' only mode of making him a- party , is by seiViti'g the usual process on the resident partner-, in the manner prescribed by the act of 1792. 2 Brev. 17Í.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Iii this Case it wás decided, that where one of several jjáf triers is resident here or'within the jurisdiction of the Court', the absent copartner cannot be made a party defendant in'a process against the firm, by attachment either directed against his private".property, or the property of the firm, arid that the' only mode of making him a- party , is by seiViti'g the usual process on the resident partner-, in the manner prescribed by the act of 1792. 2 Brev. 17Í.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 S.C.L. 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-the-united-states-v-broadfoot-scctapp-1826.