Bank of the United States v. Bomford

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Bank of the United States v. Bomford

2 F. Cas. 687, 1 Hayw. & H.D.C. 256, 1847 U.S. App. LEXIS 425

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedApril 19, 1847

StatusPublished

This text of 2 F. Cas. 687 (Bank of the United States v. Bomford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of the United States v. Bomford, 2 F. Cas. 687, 1 Hayw. & H.D.C. 256, 1847 U.S. App. LEXIS 425 (circtddc 1847).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT

(DUNLOP, Circuit Judge, not sitting)

having considered this case, is of opinion that the plaintiff was not bound to receive payment in the bank paper tendered under the said agreement

The following endorsement appears on the written opinion: “Mr. Smith desires this case should be considered by the court as if at the time of the submission and decision the defendant had purchased other bank paper, which he had in court to the amount of the plaintiff’s judgment ready to be applied thereto; to which desire the plaintiff’s attorney answered, T have no objection to this.’ ” THE COURT to this said, “It makes no difference.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT

(DUNLOP, Circuit Judge, not sitting)

having considered this case, is of opinion that the plaintiff was not bound to receive payment in the bank paper tendered under the said agreement

The following endorsement appears on the written opinion: “Mr. Smith desires this case should be considered by the court as if at the time of the submission and decision the defendant had purchased other bank paper, which he had in court to the amount of the plaintiff’s judgment ready to be applied thereto; to which desire the plaintiff’s attorney answered, T have no objection to this.’ ” THE COURT to this said, “It makes no difference.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 F. Cas. 687, 1 Hayw. & H.D.C. 256, 1847 U.S. App. LEXIS 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-the-united-states-v-bomford-circtddc-1847.