Bank of the State v. Steen

8 Ark. 36

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The objection to the reading of the writ in evidence has been heretofore disallowed, (State Bank v. Sherrill, 6 Eng. 334; same v. Magness, ib. 343:) its reading ought to have been allowed. The court also erred in denying the prayer for discovery under the statute, {Dig.p. 810, sec. 93.)

Let the judgment be reversed, and the cause be remanded to be proceeded with.