Bank of Omega v. Wingo, Ellett & Crump Shoe Co.

97 S.E. 105, 22 Ga. App. 700, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 696
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 16, 1918
Docket9677
StatusPublished

This text of 97 S.E. 105 (Bank of Omega v. Wingo, Ellett & Crump Shoe Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bank of Omega v. Wingo, Ellett & Crump Shoe Co., 97 S.E. 105, 22 Ga. App. 700, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 696 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The law of this case, as settled by the decision of this court when the case was here on demurrer (19 Ga. App. 177, 91 S. E. 251), concludes the plaintiff in error and this court on the question as to whether the Bank of Omega is liable to the plaintiff by reason of the letter of its cashier to the plaintiff, referred to in the opinion of the court. The evidence was sufficient to prove the allegations of the-petition, and the trial court did not err in rendering judgment for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Jenkins,’ J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bank of Omega v. Wingo
91 S.E. 251 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 S.E. 105, 22 Ga. App. 700, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-omega-v-wingo-ellett-crump-shoe-co-gactapp-1918.