Bank of Omega v. Findley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bank of Omega v. Findley

94 S.E. 811, 21 Ga. App. 620, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 435

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 22, 1918

Docket8860

StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 811 (Bank of Omega v. Findley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of Omega v. Findley, 94 S.E. 811, 21 Ga. App. 620, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 435 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

The court in its charge fully and fairly submitted to the jury the question of whether, under the evidence, the cashier of the plaintiff bank, was acting as the agent of the plaintiff or as agent of the defendant, in collecting and applying the alleged payments; the jury found in favor of the defendant on that issue, and that the cashier in so acting was the agent of the plaintiff bank; the evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins, J.

The court in its charge fully and fairly submitted to the jury the question of whether, under the evidence, the cashier of the plaintiff bank, was acting as the agent of the plaintiff or as agent of the defendant, in collecting and applying the alleged payments; the jury found in favor of the defendant on that issue, and that the cashier in so acting was the agent of the plaintiff bank; the evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 S.E. 811, 21 Ga. App. 620, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-omega-v-findley-gactapp-1918.