Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Pogonovich

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Pogonovich

192 A.3d 1107

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 28, 2018·No. No. 147 WAL 2018·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*1108AND NOW , this 28th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues rephrased for clarity are:

(1) Did the Superior Court depart from accepted judicial practices or abuse its discretion in finding as fact that Petitioner admitted to being personally served with the complaint in mortgage foreclosure?

(2) Did the Superior Court depart from accepted judicial practices or abuse its discretion in concluding as a matter of law that Petitioner had been served with original process with the underlying foreclosure complaint?

Justice Baer did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

*1108AND NOW , this 28th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues rephrased for clarity are:

(1) Did the Superior Court depart from accepted judicial practices or abuse its discretion in finding as fact that Petitioner admitted to being personally served with the complaint in mortgage foreclosure?

(2) Did the Superior Court depart from accepted judicial practices or abuse its discretion in concluding as a matter of law that Petitioner had been served with original process with the underlying foreclosure complaint?

Justice Baer did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Pogonovich, 192 A.3d 1107 (Pa. 2018).

Pincite

192 A.3d 1107 (Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Pogonovich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.