Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Arussy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Arussy

2020 NY Slip Op 06082, 187 A.D.3d 1110, 131 N.Y.S.3d 619

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 2020

DocketIndex No. 505692/15

StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 06082 (Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Arussy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Arussy, 2020 NY Slip Op 06082, 187 A.D.3d 1110, 131 N.Y.S.3d 619 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

Bank of N.Y. Mellon v Arussy (2020 NY Slip Op 06082)

Bank of N.Y. Mellon v Arussy

2020 NY Slip Op 06082

Decided on October 28, 2020

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 28, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P.
HECTOR D. LASALLE
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2018-10061
(Index No. 505692/15)

[*1]Bank of New York Mellon, etc., appellant,

v

Chana Arussy, respondent, et al., defendants.

Frenkel, Lambert, Weiss, Weisman & Gordon, LLP, Bay Shore, NY (Ruth O'Connor of counsel), for appellant.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Noach Dear, J.), dated June 14, 2018. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Chana Arussy, to strike her answer, affirmative defenses, and counterclaims, and for an order of reference.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

For the reasons stated in Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v Kelly (166 AD3d 843), we agree with the Supreme Court's determination denying those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Chana Arussy, to strike her answer, affirmative defenses, and counterclaims, and for an order of reference.

LEVENTHAL, J.P., LASALLE, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI