Bank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Barry
This text of 187 S.E.2d 478 (Bank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Barry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record on appeal was not docketed within the time allowed by Rule 5, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina, and the record contains no order extending the time for docketing. For failure to docket the record on appeal within the time allowed by the rules of this Court, the appeal may be dismissed. Rule 5, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
The only assignments of error are to the charge of the court. However, no exception is noted in the record. Assignments of error to the charge based upon exceptions appearing nowhere in the record but under the assignments of error are ineffective. State v. Dunn, 264 N.C. 391, 141 S.E. 2d 630 (1965); Rule 21, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina; 1 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 31, p. 166. Nevertheless, we have carefully reviewed the charge to the jury as contained in the record, and find no prejudicial error. Defendants’ contention that the court expressed an opinion as to whether a fact was fully or sufficiently proven in violation of G.S. 1A-1, Rule 51(a) is without merit.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 S.E.2d 478, 14 N.C. App. 169, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 2073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-north-carolina-n-a-v-barry-ncctapp-1972.