Home/New York Supreme Court/Bank of Niagara v. Austin

Bank of Niagara v. Austin

6 Wend. 548
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 4, 1831
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 6 Wend. 548 (Bank of Niagara v. Austin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bank of Niagara v. Austin, 6 Wend. 548 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1831).

Opinion

Counsel fee, attending prepared either to try cause or argue case, is a proper charge when the cause is noticed by either party.

Attorney's fee, attending prepared to argue a case, is not a proper charge when the case is not argued, except when the attendance is pursuant to notice from the opposite party.

A foreign witness, subpoenaed at the place of trial, is not entitled to travelling fees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Keck v. Seibert
32 S.W. 670 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1895)
Wheeler v. Lozee
12 How. Pr. 446 (New York Supreme Court, 1856)
Dowling v. Bush
6 How. Pr. 410 (New York Supreme Court, 1852)
Schenck v. Lathrop
3 Hill & Den. 449 (New York Supreme Court, 1842)
People ex rel. Union Bank v. New York C. P.
19 Wend. 113 (New York Supreme Court, 1838)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Wend. 548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-niagara-v-austin-nysupct-1831.