Bank of New York v. Gobbi
This text of Bank of New York v. Gobbi (Bank of New York v. Gobbi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1685
BANK OF NEW YORK, Trustee under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Series 1988-A,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JARA UZENDA GOBBI,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
SCOTT GOBBI; LYONS COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSO- CIATION, INCORPORATED; KATRINA DAVIS ARMOUR,
Defendants.
No. 01-1686
SUN TRUST MORTGAGE CORPORATION,
and SCOTT GOBBI; LYONS COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSO- CIATION, INCORPORATED; KATRINA DAVIS ARMOUR,
No. 01-1687
BANK OF NEW YORK, Trustee under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Series 1988-A,
SCOTT GOBBI; LYONS COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSO- CIATION, INCORPORATED; KATRINA DAVIS ARMOUR,
No. 01-1688
BANK OF NEW YORK, Trustee under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Series 1988-A,
2 JARA UZENDA GOBBI,
SCOTT GOBBI; LYONS COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSO- CIATION, INCORPORATED; KATRINA DAVIS ARMOUR,
No. 01-1689
BANK OF NEW YORK, Trustee under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Series 1988-A,
SCOTT GOBBI; LYONS COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSO- CIATION, INCORPORATED; KATRINA DAVIS ARMOUR,
No. 01-1690
BANK OF NEW YORK, Trustee under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Series 1988-A,
3 versus
SCOTT GOBBI; LYONS COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSO- CIATION, INCORPORATED; KATRINA DAVIS ARMOUR,
No. 01-1691
BANK OF NEW YORK, Trustee under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Series 1988-A,
SCOTT GOBBI; LYONS COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSO- CIATION, INCORPORATED; KATRINA DAVIS ARMOUR,
4 No. 01-1692
BANK OF NEW YORK, Trustee under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Series 1988-A,
SCOTT GOBBI; LYONS COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSO- CIATION, INCORPORATED; KATRINA DAVIS ARMOUR,
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-01-2135-4-22, CA-01-2136-4-22, CA-01-2137-4-22, CA-01- 2138-4-22, CA-01-2139-4-22, CA-01-2140-4-22, CA-01-2141-4-22, CA- 01-2142-4-22)
Submitted: October 10, 2001 Decided: November 5, 2001
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jara Uzenda Gobbi, Appellant Pro Se. John Sanford Kay, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
5 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Jara Uzenda Gobbi appeals from the district court’s order
remanding eight mortgage foreclosure actions to the state court
after a petition to remove by Gobbi. The district court’s remand
order is not reviewable. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (1994). Accordingly,
we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Gobbi’s
motion and supplemental motion to restrain opposing counsel and for
an evidentiary hearing and her motion to restore case file. We
further deny her motion to place the appeals in abeyance for deter-
mination of filing status because she has been granted leave to
proceed in forma pauperis in these appeals. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bank of New York v. Gobbi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-new-york-v-gobbi-ca4-2001.