Bank of New York v. Double Disc Grinding of Hauppauge, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bank of New York v. Double Disc Grinding of Hauppauge, Inc.

206 A.D.2d 399, 616 N.Y.S.2d 186, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7310

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 11, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 206 A.D.2d 399 (Bank of New York v. Double Disc Grinding of Hauppauge, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of New York v. Double Disc Grinding of Hauppauge, Inc., 206 A.D.2d 399, 616 N.Y.S.2d 186, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7310 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover a balance due under an equipment lease, the defendant George Munoz appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered January 12, 1993, which denied his motion to vacate a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon his default in opposing a motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the appellant’s papers in support of his motion to vacate the default judgment were bereft of a reasonable excuse for his failure to oppose the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Brownsville Assocs. v Mathis, 137 AD2d 743). Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover a balance due under an equipment lease, the defendant George Munoz appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered January 12, 1993, which denied his motion to vacate a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon his default in opposing a motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the appellant’s papers in support of his motion to vacate the default judgment were bereft of a reasonable excuse for his failure to oppose the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Brownsville Assocs. v Mathis, 137 AD2d 743). Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 A.D.2d 399, 616 N.Y.S.2d 186, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-new-york-v-double-disc-grinding-of-hauppauge-inc-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack