Bank of New York v. Blanton
Opinion
[Cite as Bank of New York v. Blanton, 134 Ohio St.3d 368, 2012-Ohio-5498.]
BANK OF NEW YORK, TRUSTEE, APPELLEE, v. BLANTON, APPELLANT. [Cite as Bank of New York v. Blanton, 134 Ohio St.3d 368, 2012-Ohio-5498.] Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. (No. 2012-0897—Submitted December 4, 2012—Decided December 5, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clermont County, No. CA2011-03-019, 2012-Ohio-1597. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Manley Deas Kochalski, L.L.C., and Edward Kochalski, for appellee. Andrew M. Engel, for appellant, James Blanton. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2012 Ohio 5498 (Bank of New York v. Blanton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.