Bank of New York v. Blanton

2012 Ohio 5498
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bank of New York v. Blanton. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 Ohio St. 3d 368
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 5, 2012·No. 2012-0897·Published

Opinion

[Cite as Bank of New York v. Blanton, 134 Ohio St.3d 368, 2012-Ohio-5498.]

BANK OF NEW YORK, TRUSTEE, APPELLEE, v. BLANTON, APPELLANT. [Cite as Bank of New York v. Blanton, 134 Ohio St.3d 368, 2012-Ohio-5498.] Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. (No. 2012-0897—Submitted December 4, 2012—Decided December 5, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clermont County, No. CA2011-03-019, 2012-Ohio-1597. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Manley Deas Kochalski, L.L.C., and Edward Kochalski, for appellee. Andrew M. Engel, for appellant, James Blanton. ______________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bank of New York v. Blanton, 2012 Ohio 5498 (Ohio 2012).

2012 Ohio 5498 (Bank of New York v. Blanton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of New York v. Blanton
982 N.E.2d 698 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)