Bank of New York & Trust Co. v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bank of New York & Trust Co. v. Miller

240 A.D. 992

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 992 (Bank of New York & Trust Co. v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of New York & Trust Co. v. Miller, 240 A.D. 992 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order settling receiver’s account modified by disallowing the following items: “ Removing dirt from cellar, $10; William MaeTyre, repairing furnace and plumbing, $52.50; Mr. Powers, plumbing repairs, $6; ” and by striking out the fifty dollars allowed as commissions and the receiver’s' account surcharged with those amounts. As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs, [993]*993on the ground that the special circumstances shown in this record warrant a charge on the plaintiff of the deficiency arising between the amounts of the receipts and disbursements by the receiver — the plaintiff having had the benefit thereof in the improvement of the property. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order settling receiver’s account modified by disallowing the following items: “ Removing dirt from cellar, $10; William MaeTyre, repairing furnace and plumbing, $52.50; Mr. Powers, plumbing repairs, $6; ” and by striking out the fifty dollars allowed as commissions and the receiver’s' account surcharged with those amounts. As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs, [993]*993on the ground that the special circumstances shown in this record warrant a charge on the plaintiff of the deficiency arising between the amounts of the receipts and disbursements by the receiver — the plaintiff having had the benefit thereof in the improvement of the property. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-new-york-trust-co-v-miller-nyappdiv-1933.