Bank of New York Mellon v. Timothy M. Clark, Sanctuary at Redfish Condominium Association, Inc. Excuisite Builders, LLC Beach Community Bank Unknown Occupant 1 Unknown Occupant 2 Unknown Spouce of Timothy M. Clark

183 So. 3d 1271
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 4, 2016
Docket1D15-2250
StatusPublished

This text of 183 So. 3d 1271 (Bank of New York Mellon v. Timothy M. Clark, Sanctuary at Redfish Condominium Association, Inc. Excuisite Builders, LLC Beach Community Bank Unknown Occupant 1 Unknown Occupant 2 Unknown Spouce of Timothy M. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bank of New York Mellon v. Timothy M. Clark, Sanctuary at Redfish Condominium Association, Inc. Excuisite Builders, LLC Beach Community Bank Unknown Occupant 1 Unknown Occupant 2 Unknown Spouce of Timothy M. Clark, 183 So. 3d 1271 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellant argues the trial court abused its discretion when it dismissed appellant’s foreclosure claim with prejudice as a sanction for counsel’s discovery violations without making explicit written findings .pursuant to Kozel v. Ostendoyf, 629 So.2d 817 (Fla.1993). We agree and. reverse and remand for the trial court to consider the six factors outlined in Kozel and whether a sanction less severe than dismissal with prejudice is a viable alternative in light of those factors. If, after considering these factors, the trial court concludes that the conduct of appellant and/or its counsel warrants dismissal of the action-with prejudice, the court shall enter an order containing explicit findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to each of the six Kozel factors and with respect to the determination that no less severe sanction would be a viable alternative under .the circumstances. See Smith v. City of Panama. City, 951 So.2d 959, 962 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

ROBERTS, C.J., and WOLF, J., concur; THOMAS, J., specially concurring with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kozel v. Ostendorf
629 So. 2d 817 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Smith v. City of Panama City
951 So. 2d 959 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Edward Whiddon, Holly Whiddon
164 So. 3d 97 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 So. 3d 1271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-new-york-mellon-v-timothy-m-clark-sanctuary-at-redfish-fladistctapp-2016.